Hong Kong officials have launched a criminal probe into a troubling incident at the University of Hong Kong involving a male law student allegedly using artificial intelligence to create unauthorized deepfake pornographic pictures of more than twelve female students and instructors. This formal investigation, revealed recently by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, comes after a considerable outcry from students at the city’s most historic institution, who voiced strong discontent with the university’s handling of the situation. The event highlights the swiftly changing issues introduced by the abuse of AI and the pressing necessity for strong regulatory measures.
The accusations against the student were brought to public attention through a widely circulated letter posted on Instagram by an account managed by three unnamed victims. This letter detailed a chilling discovery: folders on the accused’s laptop purportedly containing more than 700 deepfake images, meticulously organized by victim’s name, alongside the original photos from which they were derived. According to the victims’ account, the male law student allegedly sourced photographs of the individuals from their social media profiles, subsequently employing AI software to manipulate these images into explicit, pornographic content featuring their faces. While it has not been confirmed that these fabricated images were broadly disseminated, their mere existence and the alleged intent behind their creation have ignited a significant controversy.
The sequence of events presented by the victims suggests a worrisome delay in how the university addressed the issue. The images were supposedly found and reported to the university in February. Nonetheless, the university only reportedly began interviewing some of the affected parties in March. By April, one of the victims learned that the accused student had submitted a brief “apology letter” consisting of just 60 words. Although the validity of this letter and the Instagram account managed by the victims could not be independently corroborated, the University of Hong Kong acknowledged that it was aware of “social media posts regarding a student allegedly using AI tools to produce inappropriate images.” In its initial public statement issued on a Saturday, the university confirmed it had given a warning letter to the student and required him to issue a formal apology to those impacted.
This response, however, failed to quell the growing outrage among the student body. The victims, in their public letter, sharply criticized the university’s perceived inaction, lamenting that they were compelled to continue sharing classroom spaces with the accused student on at least four occasions. This forced proximity, they argued, inflicted “unnecessary psychological distress.” The broader student community subsequently intensified its demands for more decisive and stringent measures from the university administration.
The situation rapidly expanded outside the bounds of the university, drawing the focus of the top authority in Hong Kong. Chief Executive John Lee made a public statement about the controversy at a press conference, stressing the “duty of nurturing students’ ethical values” that educational establishments hold. He asserted without reservation that academic institutions ought to “handle student misbehavior firmly,” highlighting that “any actions harming others could potentially be a criminal offense and might also violate individual rights and privacy.” This involvement at a high level indicated the seriousness with which authorities were starting to regard the issue, surpassing what was initially just an internal disciplinary affair within the university.
The University of Hong Kong has subsequently expressed a reconsideration of its strategy. Initially, it did not address specific questions from media representatives directly, but later, it notified local news channels that it was carrying out an additional examination of the situation and promised to implement further steps if considered necessary or if victims requested stricter measures. Its declaration expressed a dedication to maintaining “a secure and respectful educational setting,” indicating an awareness of the necessity for a more effective reaction to the issues highlighted by both students and the general public.
The rise of deepfake pornography created through AI introduces a complex global legal and ethical dilemma. This kind of non-consensual adult content involves the intricate modification of existing pictures or the fabrication of completely new ones using accessible artificial intelligence applications, intended to falsely portray individuals in sexual activities. The legal framework in Hong Kong, similar to numerous other regions, is currently struggling to catch up with the swift progress of this technology. Although current legislation criminalizes the “distribution or threat of distribution of intimate images without consent,” they do not clearly prohibit the creation or private possession of these manufactured images.
This legal lacuna creates significant challenges for prosecution and victim protection. In the United States, for instance, President Donald Trump signed legislation in May that specifically bans the non-consensual online publication of AI-generated porn. However, federal law does not explicitly prohibit personal possession of such images, and a district judge notably ruled in February that merely possessing such content was protected under the First Amendment. This contrasts sharply with approaches taken by some other nations. South Korea, for example, after experiencing several similar scandals, enacted legislation last year that goes further by criminalizing not only the possession but also the consumption of such deepfake content, reflecting a more stringent stance against this form of digital abuse.
The Hong Kong case serves as a poignant illustration of the urgent need for legal frameworks to evolve alongside technological capabilities. As AI tools become more accessible and sophisticated, the potential for their malicious use, particularly in creating realistic yet entirely fabricated intimate imagery, poses a profound threat to individual privacy, reputation, and psychological well-being. The lack of clear legal prohibitions on the creation or private possession of such material can leave victims feeling unprotected and authorities struggling to prosecute perpetrators effectively.
Beyond the legal aspects, the incident also highlights the responsibilities of educational institutions in fostering a safe and respectful environment, both online and offline. Universities are increasingly grappling with how to address digital misconduct that may not neatly fit into existing disciplinary codes, particularly when it involves advanced technologies like AI. The initial response by the University of Hong Kong, perceived as insufficient by its students, underscores the need for clear protocols, swift action, and strong support systems for victims of tech-facilitated abuse.
The criminal investigation by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data in Hong Kong marks a critical step towards addressing the issue more comprehensively. Its involvement signals that the authorities are now treating the matter with the seriousness it warrants, recognizing the potential criminal implications beyond mere academic misconduct. This investigation could set an important precedent for future cases involving AI-generated non-consensual content in Hong Kong, potentially influencing legislative reforms and strengthening victim protections.
The current debate at the University of Hong Kong acts as an international warning. It highlights the necessity for societies to actively establish solid legal, ethical, and institutional measures as artificial intelligence progresses, aiming to minimize its potential dangers. Safeguarding people from online misuse, particularly when advanced tools are employed to breach privacy and fabricate harmful content, is becoming a critical priority in our digital era. The results of this inquiry and the actions taken by the university will, without a doubt, be observed attentively as Hong Kong, along with the rest of the world, confronts the adverse aspects of technological advancement.
