Europe’s New Fear: Electric Buses & China Vulnerability

Mounting worries regarding reliance on technology are transforming Europe’s strategy for public transit and digital security. A sector that was previously calm and effective in Scandinavia is now the focal point of an intense discussion concerning national defense and digital autonomy.

Rising alarms over Chinese-built buses

Public transport providers in Denmark and Norway are facing a possible security vulnerability within their electric bus fleets, particularly in vehicles manufactured by Yutong, the globe’s leading bus producer headquartered in Zhengzhou, China. The problem arises from the buses’ capacity to accept remote software updates and perform diagnostic assessments – a functionality that, despite its technological sophistication, also sparks worries that the vehicles could be disabled or controlled remotely.

Movia, the premier public transportation authority in Denmark, has conceded that this wireless capability could enable an external entity—be it the producer or a cybercriminal—to remotely incapacitate a bus. Jeppe Gaard, Movia’s chief operating officer, clarified that this issue isn’t exclusive to Chinese manufacturers but represents a wider concern linked to the growing digital integration in contemporary vehicles. Both electric cars and buses, he pointed out, are heavily dependent on networked systems that are, theoretically, susceptible to remote access and deactivation.

Since 2019, Movia has incorporated more than 260 Yutong buses into its fleet serving Copenhagen and eastern Denmark. Similar concerns were echoed in Norway, where Ruter, a major public transportation provider, conducted its own investigation. The company carried out controlled tests on both Yutong and Dutch-made VDL buses in secure, underground facilities. The findings showed that while the Dutch models lacked remote update capabilities, Yutong maintained direct digital access to its vehicles for software updates and diagnostics — meaning that, at least theoretically, the buses could be rendered inoperable remotely, even though they could not be remotely driven.

China’s reaction and data security guarantees

Yutong has addressed these allegations by asserting its adherence to global standards and underscoring its dedication to data protection and digital security. The company declared that all vehicle-related data within the European Union is safely stored in an Amazon Web Services data facility situated in Frankfurt, Germany. Yutong additionally guaranteed that all retained information is encrypted, safeguarded by stringent access limitations, and cannot be accessed without explicit customer consent.

Despite these assurances, European officials and transportation firms maintain a wary stance. This event has amplified conversations regarding Europe’s increasing reliance on Chinese technology—a connection marked by reciprocal economic advantages yet overshadowed by profound geopolitical suspicion. Beijing’s purported participation in cyber espionage, intellectual property theft, and surveillance operations has prompted numerous European leaders to reevaluate the enduring consequences of their dependence on Chinese providers for essential infrastructure.

A wider European predicament

The scrutiny surrounding Yutong’s buses is only the latest episode in Europe’s complex technological relationship with China. Across the continent, policymakers are attempting to strike a delicate balance between leveraging China’s advanced manufacturing capabilities and protecting national interests. Recent events — including the Netherlands’ decision to seize control of the Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia — have fueled concerns that Europe’s automotive and technology sectors could face major disruptions in the event of diplomatic or trade tensions.

Many administrations have already implemented measures to restrict susceptibility to potential weaknesses. Several European countries, emulating the United States, have purged Huawei and ZTE apparatus from their 5G infrastructure, citing espionage and data manipulation hazards. Currently, focus has shifted to the rapidly expanding sector of Chinese electric vehicles. As per JATO Dynamics, Chinese EVs saw their market penetration in Europe double in early 2025, surpassing 5% — a statistic that underscores both consumer demand and regulatory apprehension.

China, for its part, has dismissed Western fears as unfounded and politically motivated. Earlier this year, a spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry criticized U.S. restrictions on Chinese automotive technology, arguing that such measures “overstretch the concept of national security.” Chinese officials maintain that their companies operate transparently and pose no threat to foreign nations.

Western intelligence concerns

Security specialists throughout Europe, however, maintain a degree of skepticism. Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6, cautioned that Western administrations are confronting a predicament akin to the one presented by Huawei during the deployment of 5G technology. From his perspective, the growing ubiquity of internet-connected automobiles produced by Chinese companies might introduce novel points of weakness. He posited that, under the most dire circumstances, China could hypothetically incapacitate numerous electric vehicle fleets in prominent urban centers — a situation capable of paralyzing transit systems during an emergency.

Still, some cybersecurity experts contend that such a situation, though technically possible, is improbable. Ken Munro, the creator of the Anglo-American company Pen Test Partners, pointed out that any vehicle connected to the internet—regardless of whether it’s manufactured by a Western or Chinese firm—inherently carries dangers of distant manipulation. Even prominent names such as Tesla, he clarified, rely on software connections that could be compromised under particular circumstances.

In light of these worries, Ruter has put in place several safeguards, such as improved cybersecurity measures, firewalls, and more rigorous scrutiny of upcoming vehicle purchases. The organization is also collaborating with national agencies to define more precise cybersecurity guidelines for public transportation networks. Nevertheless, specialists are still split on the adequacy of these preventative steps. Munro warned that the sole guaranteed way to eradicate the danger would be to entirely disconnect vehicles from the internet — an action that would simultaneously impede the capacity to carry out essential updates and remote upkeep.

Where groundbreaking ideas meet susceptibility

The discussion emerging in Scandinavia highlights a wider contradiction of the digital era: the very technologies that facilitate efficiency and progress can simultaneously expose systems to novel types of hazards. As urban centers endeavor to update public transit and decrease carbon output via electrification, they are also compelled to confront issues concerning technological autonomy, information confidentiality, and national defense.

Europe’s reliance on Chinese-made components and software extends far beyond public transport. From communication networks to renewable energy infrastructure, the continent’s modernization is deeply intertwined with China’s industrial ecosystem. As global tensions rise, the challenge for European nations will be to secure their technological independence without stalling their progress toward sustainability and innovation.

The debate over Yutong’s bus fleet highlights a critical point: cybersecurity is now as vital as sustainable power in defining the trajectory of city transportation. This challenge extends beyond a single nation or producer, marking a pivotal moment for the subsequent stage of Europe’s digital evolution.

In conclusion, as Ken Munro so aptly put it, the core of the discussion centers on a single concept—trust. And in our progressively intertwined global landscape, trust could very well emerge as the most precious and delicate commodity.