In a spacious warehouse situated in the eastern region of Thailand, near an important highway, government inspector Thitipas Choddaechachainun meticulously examines piles of discarded electronics—circuit boards, metal fragments, and outdated computer components. Each week, she and her team from the Thai Ministry of Industry visit unauthorized locations handling electronic waste, collecting samples for laboratory analysis and to ensure regulatory compliance.
Choddaechachainun leads a dedicated task force addressing the country’s growing challenge with electronic waste, or e-waste. Despite routine inspections and raids on these unlicensed processing sites—many hidden in rural regions to avoid scrutiny—the scale of the problem continues to intensify.
Thailand is experiencing the consequences of a shift in global e-waste flows. Historically, countries like China handled the bulk of electronic refuse from wealthier nations, especially the United States and those within the European Union. That changed in 2018, when China instituted a ban on e-waste imports, prompting exporters to seek alternatives across Southeast Asia, including Thailand.
In response, Thailand imposed its own ban on e-waste imports in 2020. But the results have been far from reassuring. According to Earth Thailand, a nonprofit environmental advocacy group, e-waste imports have skyrocketed from approximately 3,000 tonnes annually before the Chinese ban to around 60,000 tonnes today.
This influx is partly fueled by high turnover rates in electronic devices among Western consumers. Frequent upgrades to smartphones, laptops, and other electronic goods—combined with widespread ownership of large household appliances—generate substantial waste. Although international regulations aim to prevent the export of hazardous waste to developing nations, loopholes remain. For example, shipments are often misdeclared as used electronics meant for resale, only to be dismantled and smelted upon arrival.
The recycling procedure poses significant environmental risks. In Thailand, electronic waste is dismantled and melted to reclaim valuable materials such as copper and gold. While this method of recovery is profitable, it emits dangerous substances like mercury and lead, contaminating the air, soil, and water.
Thai authorities are of the opinion that most of the gathered metals are sent to China, resulting in environmental and social impacts.
Thai Industry Minister Akanat Promphan speaks out regarding the damage these operations inflict. He stresses that the unlawful recycling sector fails to benefit the country’s economy and instead causes harm to local environments and populations. His department has initiated a more intensive effort to close down illegal activities and remove foreign-owned facilities engaged in unlawful practices.
Thailand is being treated as a waste deposit site, Promphan notes. “We are contending with a global waste disposal activity that offers no advantage to our nation and causes significant harm.”
The harmful effects reach ordinary people such as Seng Wongsena, a 57-year-old agricultural worker in eastern Thailand. He asserts that contaminated runoff from a nearby smelting plant has negatively impacted his cassava crop, and the odor of burning waste disturbs his rest at night. Community activists argue that the smelting operation lacks proper authorization and are urging government officials to take action.
On a global scale, the implications are sobering. Data from the United Nations indicates that more than 60 million tonnes of e-waste are generated globally each year—double the volume recorded 15 years ago. Forecasts suggest that this figure could rise by over 30% by the end of the decade.
Despite the concerning rise, merely around 20% of worldwide electronic waste is processed through responsible and eco-friendly methods. The remainder is discarded in landfills or handled under hazardous conditions, frequently in nations with inadequate regulatory control.
Several nations have enacted regulations regarding extended producer responsibility. These regulations hold producers accountable for the disposal of their goods once they reach the end of their life span. Companies such as Apple, Samsung, and Dell are being urged to establish methods for reclaiming and recycling their merchandise.
Thailand is evaluating a comparable legal framework, with the goal of bolstering local enforcement and decreasing unlawful practices associated with electronic waste management. Promphan is hopeful about its enforcement in the future.
“I’m hopeful that we will enact this legislation soon—potentially before this year ends or at the beginning of the next,” he states. “We need comprehensive actions to eliminate this illegal industry and protect our people and the environment.”
As Thailand works toward legal reform and improved oversight, its efforts serve as a microcosm of a much broader challenge. E-waste management requires global coordination, transparent supply chains, and the cooperation of both consumers and manufacturers. Without significant change, the environmental cost of our digital age may far outweigh its benefits.
